Which kind of legislative enactments is considered void under Georgia's constitution?

Legislative enactments in Georgia that violate the state or U.S. Constitution are deemed void because they contravene the foundational legal framework that governs the state. The constitution sets the rules and principles that all laws must adhere to, ensuring that no legislative act can overstep these bounds. When an act is found to infringe upon constitutional provisions—such as those related to individual rights, the separation of powers, or procedural requirements—it lacks legal validity and cannot be upheld. This principle is essential to maintaining the rule of law and protecting the rights of citizens, ensuring that all legislative efforts operate within the legal framework established by the constitution.

Other options, while they may present potential concerns, do not automatically render an act void. For instance, an act approved by the Governor is valid unless it conflicts with the constitution. Similarly, acts passed by a simple majority or newly introduced in a session can still be lawful practices within the legislative process, provided they align with constitutional standards. Thus, the critical factor for determining the void nature of a legislative act lies in its alignment with constitutional mandates.