Which of the following is an effective defense against an accusation of libel in Georgia?

The correct answer is that the truth may be given as evidence in the trial. In defamation cases, including libel, the truth is a recognized defense. If the accused can demonstrate that the statements made were true, this can effectively negate the claim of libel. This principle underscores the fundamental legal maxim that "truth is an absolute defense" in both civil and criminal defamation cases.

The ability to show that a statement is true not only defends against claims of libel but can also serve to vindicate the speaker's reputation when called into question. This aligns with the protected rights under the First Amendment, which underscores the importance of freedom of speech—including the necessity of being able to speak the truth.

Other potential defenses, such as proof of malice, pertain more to cases involving public figures or officials, where the plaintiff must prove actual malice—a higher standard of proof than in cases involving private individuals. Exceeding the statute of limitations does not function as a defense but rather as a procedural bar to a claim being brought forward after a certain period. A confidentiality agreement does not absolve someone from liability in a libel case; rather, it pertains to keeping certain information secure rather than defending against accusations of defamation.